Buyers keep using legacy suppliers, fragmented categories, and free-text channels. The Engine maps actual spend against negotiated agreements and prescribes the structural moves that close the gap.
Savings are negotiated, but not realized because spend remains structurally misaligned. Buyers keep using legacy suppliers, fragmented categories, non-preferred channels, free-text purchasing, and habitual buying patterns. The result is leakage between what gets negotiated and what gets realized.
A plan that converts negotiated savings into actual EBITDA impact. Built from spend, contracts, and supplier data in four steps.
AP, PO, invoice, sourcing, and supplier data are ingested; messy categories and duplicate suppliers get normalized into a clean baseline.
Pricing, rebates, SLAs, volume commitments, and expiration dates are extracted from every contract in the repository.
Actual buying is mapped against negotiated terms, preferred suppliers, and approved channels — structural leakage gets flagged.
Supplier consolidation, channel shifts, demand controls, and category strategy changes are prioritized by dollar impact, difficulty, and owner.
“We don’t show you what was negotiated. We show you where it leaks — and what to do about it.”
The Spend Structure Realization Plan: a savings leakage map, supplier consolidation opportunities, off-contract spend report, channel compliance view, prioritized opportunity backlog, and a scenario model of P&L impact.
We’ll run your AP and contract extracts through the Engine and walk you through the leakage map in a working session.